top of page

Plagiarist in Chief: The Benny Johnson Story and How He Became Everything He Fought Against

40 minutes ago
7 min read


There are moments when someone you've watched for years suddenly says something that makes you stop the video.


Not because you disagree with them.


Not because they support the wrong political team.


But because you look at the screen and think:


Did he actually just say that?



For me, that moment came on July 10, outside the Provo courtroom.


I had been watching the Charlie Kirk case from a distance.


I wasn't sitting in the courtroom.


Then Benny Johnson came out of the courthouse.


And on his own channel, he told his audience that the enhanced footage showed the accused, Tyler Robinson, "committing the murder."


He went further.


He said the accused "took the shot."


I watched him say it.


And what made the moment even more surreal was the person standing behind him.


His wife.


At the points where Benny was making his most emphatic claims about what the footage supposedly showed, she could be seen shaking her head.


Now perhaps she was shaking her head about something completely unrelated.


Perhaps she'd just remembered that she'd left the oven on.


Perhaps she was wondering why her husband had once again decided that subtlety was for other people.


I don't know.


But watching that clip was the moment something clicked for me.


I thought:


Benny has gone.


Not politically.


Not ideologically.


Something more fundamental.


The man I once respected as a sharp, fearless alternative-media voice appeared to me to have crossed the line from commentator into something else.


And I've spent the days since trying to work out exactly when that happened.


What the Evidence Actually Said

Here's the bit that really got under my skin.


On July 7, Utah State Bureau of Investigation investigator David Hull was testifying under oath.


"The video does not show the actual shooting."


He also testified that he could not see a gun in the footage.


Read that again.


The investigator wasn't some bloke posting from his mother's basement.


The footage, prosecutors argued, showed a person they identify as the accused accessing the roof, moving into position and leaving around the time of the fatal shot.


And I want to be extremely clear about something.


I watched the public footage.


I watched the hearing coverage.


I did not see the sealed enhanced version that Benny apparently saw.


Maybe Benny saw something the rest of us haven't been allowed to see.


But if that is the case, then say precisely that.


Don't tell millions of people you watched the accused commit the murder when the evidence available to the public doesn't establish that.


Don't tell them you watched him take the shot when the investigator testifying under oath said the video didn't show the actual shooting.


Those are not minor differences in wording.


That's the difference between:


"This footage appears to place the accused on the roof."


and


"I watched him commit the murder."


One describes evidence.


The other announces a conclusion.

The Moment I Lost Respect

I've watched Benny for years.


I've occasionally thought he was completely bloody wrong.


But I respected the fact that he was prepared to challenge the establishment.


He was the outsider.


The guy who wasn't supposed to have a seat at the table.


The outsider got invited inside.


He became a familiar presence around the president and was eventually travelling in Trump's orbit, appearing alongside the president and producing content from his trips.



One minute you're shouting at the establishment from outside the gates.


The next you're inside the motorcade.


And then, on August 12, 2025, the White House handed Benny Johnson the microphone.


Not metaphorically.


Literally.


The Trump administration created a "new media" seat in the White House briefing room, and Benny was called first by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.



Think about that image.


First question.


The guy who built his career telling audiences that the establishment media had become part of the problem was now sitting in the room where the establishment gets questioned.


And I don't begrudge him the success.


Seriously.


But here's the problem.


The closer you get to power, the more important independence becomes.


Not less.


The Plagiarist in Chief

And this brings me to the title.


Plagiarist in Chief.


I'm not using that phrase because it's clever.


I'm using it because it is part of Benny Johnson's documented history.


On July 25, 2014, BuzzFeed fired Johnson after an internal review of more than 500 of his posts found 41 instances in which sentences or phrases had been copied word-for-word from other websites.


BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief publicly apologised to readers and said the organisation had no choice but to let Johnson go.



And there's an almost comical layer of irony here.


Because Johnson wasn't caught quietly borrowing a paragraph and hoping nobody noticed.


He had previously been loudly criticising others for plagiarism.


The internet, as usual, kept the receipts.


People can change.


But history matters when we're talking about credibility.


Especially when your entire business model is built around telling people:


The other guys are lying.


Because eventually someone is entitled to turn around and ask:


And why should I believe you?


The New Media Machine

Benny isn't simply a bloke with a podcast anymore.


He's part of a much larger political media ecosystem.


Again, there's nothing inherently wrong with that.


But replacing one information gatekeeper with another doesn't magically create truth.


It just changes who gets the keys.


And Benny's own financial history makes that worth examining.


Associated Press reporting found that Johnson received at least $486,000 in compensation from Turning Point USA.


AP also reported that Arsenal Media Group, which Johnson had described on his own website as a company he co-founded and helped operate, received $613,000 from Turning Point between 2020 and 2021.


A spokesman for Johnson disputed that he was an owner or executive of Arsenal and said his work with the company was performed as an independent contractor.


Again, let's be precise.


That doesn't prove he was paid to lie about Charlie Kirk.


It doesn't prove he has deliberately deceived anyone.


What it proves is that there is money flowing through this ecosystem.


And that matters when we're examining independence.


I Think He's Become Something Else

So here is where I stop pretending this is merely a neutral media analysis.


I think Benny Johnson has become a paid propagandist.


That's my opinion.


I think the transformation from outsider commentator to highly embedded political media personality has fundamentally changed the product.


And I think the Charlie Kirk footage was the moment I finally saw it clearly.


That doesn't prove Benny lied.


I don't know what he saw in the enhanced footage.


But when your description of evidence goes far beyond what the publicly documented testimony establishes, I think you're obligated to explain yourself.


That's not censorship.


That's accountability.


And if Benny wants to say:


"Jesse, you're wrong.

I saw an enhanced version that showed details you didn't see."


Fine.


Show us.


Or explain exactly what you saw.


You don't get to spend years demanding evidence from everyone else and then become offended when someone asks you for yours.


And Then There's the Religion

There's another piece of this that makes me increasingly uncomfortable.


The new right-wing media isn't just selling politics.


It's increasingly selling identity.


Faith.


Nation.


Family.


Trump.


Martyrdom.


Good versus evil.


The righteous versus the corrupt.


Benny has increasingly incorporated Christianity and religious language into his political media persona.


He has described Charlie Kirk in explicitly religious terms following Kirk's death and has framed major political events through a Christian worldview.


But when politics becomes religion, criticism becomes heresy.


And that's dangerous.


Because once the political leader becomes a hero, the commentator becomes a preacher, the audience becomes a congregation and every opposing argument becomes an attack on the faith, you've built something that is extremely difficult to challenge from inside.


And I think that's where the new religious grift comes in.


That's my term.


My opinion.


I'm not saying every Christian conservative is part of some scam.


I'm saying there is a growing commercial ecosystem in which politics, faith, personality, outrage and money are increasingly intertwined.


And Benny Johnson sits very comfortably inside it.


That's what bothers me.


Don't Believe Me Either

Here's the funny part.


I don't want you to blindly believe me.


Don't.


That's the entire bloody point.


Go and watch Benny's July 10 video.


Listen to exactly what he says about the footage.


Look at the footage available publicly.


Read the reports from the hearing.


Then make up your own mind.


Maybe I'm being unfair.


But I'm going to trust what I can verify.


The rest is interpretation.


And here's mine.


I think Benny Johnson has become exactly the sort of media operator he once told us to distrust.


A man selling certainty in a world where the evidence is still being examined.

A man who once stood outside the gates telling us not to trust the establishment — and now has a seat inside the building.

A man who built his reputation by challenging propaganda, but who, in my view, has now become part of the machinery himself.


And perhaps the most depressing part?


I used to respect the guy.


But when someone you thought was fighting the machine starts looking suspiciously comfortable inside it, you notice.


And you ask questions.


Because that's what independent journalism is supposed to do.


Not worship the left.

Not worship the right.

Not worship Trump.

Not worship Charlie.


And certainly not worship Benny.


Show me the evidence.


I'll make up my own mind.


And if tomorrow Benny proves me wrong, I'll happily say so.


That's the difference between having an opinion and having a religion.


One can change.


The other demands obedience.


And Remember:


Trust no Single Source

Trust Your Gut

and Stay Curious


Jesse


For media enquiries, please contact:


UK - 020 3404 2295

USA - 0650 278 4440

AUS - 02 9072 9499


Help Support Jesse and the rest of our Authors by visiting the store to get your copy of the latest Anonymous Author Novel or Anything Anonymous.




Comments


bottom of page