top of page

Shadows of Complacency - Israel Knew Hamas was Coming

The recent Hamas attack stands as a stark reminder of the costs of complacency. As reported in The New York Times, Israeli officials had the blueprint of devastation a year in advance, yet the streets ran red under the weight of disbelief. This isn’t just a story of failure; it’s a tapestry of ignored warnings, echoing some of the most grievous intelligence oversights in modern history.

As the world reels from the aftermath of October 7, when the streets of Israel became a battleground with a death toll reaching into the thousands, a haunting question lingers in the air: How did we get here? The answer, buried in pages of intelligence ignored and warnings unheeded, is as complex as it is troubling. This isn’t just the story of Israel’s failure to anticipate Hamas’s audacity; it’s a narrative that finds eerie parallels in other intelligence failures that have shaped our world.

Israel’s Failure to Heed Warnings

At the heart of this catastrophic oversight lies a 40-page document, a meticulously detailed plan of an attack that Israeli officials brushed off as a pipe dream. Codenamed “Jericho Wall,” this plan wasn’t hidden in encrypted messages or covert communications; it was in the hands of Israeli intelligence more than a year before the attack. The dismissal of this crucial intelligence, considering it too difficult for Hamas to execute, mirrors a certain hubris—a dangerous underestimation of an adversary’s capability and resolve.

Echoes of September 11, 2001

Within the clandestine realms where intelligence is key to national survival, the stark similarities between the October 7 attack and the September 11 attacks in the United States deliver a profound blow to the core of worldwide security systems. Leading up to that disastrous September morning in 2001, American intelligence agencies were not merely hinting but loudly signaling the approach of imminent danger.

In this labyrinth of lost chances, the U.S. intelligence community, much like their Israeli counterparts, seemed to play a high-stakes game of connect-the-dots, where the dots were as visible as stars in a city night sky—there, but obscured. They had intercepted messages, detected unusual flight school enrollments, and noted visa anomalies. Yet, these scattered pieces of a sinister puzzle lay unconnected, unheeded.

The 9/11 Commission Report, a document as damning as it is enlightening, laid bare a litany of these missed opportunities and underestimations. It painted a picture of an intelligence community ensnared in its own web of bureaucracy and overconfidence. In its pages, a narrative of disbelief unfolds, strikingly similar to the one that unraveled in Israel.

This isn’t just a story of failure; it’s a tale of an almost willful blindness. A disbelief that’s not just about underestimating the enemy, but underestimating the very nature of threat and change in a world where the improbable becomes probable, where the unthinkable becomes reality.

Echoing through a realm of overlooked warnings, the outlines of intelligence analysts emerge, illuminated by the glare of their screens yet shrouded in the darkness of unseen threats. The indicators of impending peril were present: memos cautioning of plans to attack the United States, FBI agents sounding the alarm about Middle Eastern men in flight schools, and the CIA's knowledge of terrorists covertly residing within the U.S. borders.

Yet, in a narrative where the bizarre becomes the norm and the shocking becomes the expected, these warnings were lost in a haze of bureaucratic inertia and a culture of complacency. It was as if the intelligence community had developed a “built-in shockproof detector,” but had forgotten how to use it.

In the aftermath, as the towers fell and the world changed, the U.S. intelligence community faced a reckoning. It was a moment of introspection, where the stark reality of failure was as clear as the debris-laden streets of New York.

Fast forward to the October 7 attack in Israel, and it’s as if the ghost of 9/11 whispered in the ears of those who had forgotten its lessons. The Israeli intelligence’s dismissal of the “Jericho Wall” plan, their underestimation of Hamas’s capabilities, mirrors the tragic oversight of American intelligence two decades earlier.

The failure was not just a lapse in gathering intelligence; it was a failure in imagination, a failure to envision the full scale of what their adversaries were capable of. It was, in a twist, a radical chic of intelligence blunders, where the very institutions meant to foresee and forestall such catastrophes were caught flat-footed.

Pearl Harbor: The Prototype of Intelligence Blunders

Delving deeper into the annals of history, the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941 emerges as the archetypal intelligence failure, a harbinger of the cataclysms that can ensue when warning signs are ignored. It was a Sunday morning that jolted the world, an audacious strike that shattered the illusion of invulnerability surrounding American shores.

American codebreakers, in their cryptic world of ciphers and secret messages, had already intercepted Japanese communications. The airwaves whispered of impending hostility, and the undercurrents of geopolitical tensions were palpable. Yet, in a stunning display of disbelief, the prospect of Japan daring to strike directly at the United States was largely brushed aside.

It wasn’t just a failure of intelligence gathering; it was a failure of imagination and perception. The prevailing belief that the vast Pacific Ocean was an insurmountable barrier, a protective moat around the American castle, created a false sense of security. It was a narrative of invincibility, a belief so entrenched that the idea of a surprise attack seemed more fiction than impending reality.

This misjudgment was not merely an oversight; it was a miscalculation with dire consequences. The Japanese attack took advantage of this blind spot, striking with precision and ferocity. The devastation at Pearl Harbor was not just physical; it was psychological, shattering the American psyche and irrevocably altering the course of the Second World War.

In the wake of the attack, the U.S. military and intelligence communities were forced to confront a harsh truth: their assumptions about the world and their enemies were fundamentally flawed. It was a moment of reckoning, a realization that the world was changing in ways they had failed to fully comprehend.

The echoes of Pearl Harbor reverberate through history, a reminder that the most significant threats often arise from where they are least expected. The attack stands as a testament to the perils of complacency, of underestimating an adversary’s capabilities and intentions. It is a lesson about the cost of ignoring the rumblings on the horizon, of dismissing the possibility that the unthinkable can, and sometimes does, become reality.

In many ways, Pearl Harbor set the stage for the intelligence blunders that followed in later decades. It served as a prototype, a grim blueprint of what happens when warning signs are overlooked and threats are underestimated. As with the recent Israeli intelligence failure and the attacks of September 11, the tragedy of Pearl Harbor reminds us that the greatest danger often lies in what is not seen, or worse, what is seen but not believed.

The Bay of Pigs Invasion: A Misguided Adventure

The Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 marks a glaring example of strategic miscalculation in the diary of intelligence misadventures, a misguided escapade that spiraled into a monumental debacle. This ill-fated invasion, a brainchild of the U.S. against Cuba, was rooted in a profound misreading of the Cuban political climate and an overestimation of the CIA’s ability to manipulate it.

The plan, audacious in its conception, was premised on the belief that a small band of exiled insurgents could land on Cuban soil and magically ignite a counter-revolution against Fidel Castro’s burgeoning regime. It was a gambit that underestimated Castro’s grip on the Cuban people and overestimated the discontent simmering among them.

This was more than just an intelligence failure; it was a failure of understanding, a stark misjudgment of the complexities and nuances of Cuban nationalism. The CIA, in its covert machinations, envisioned a Cuba ripe for rebellion, eager to overthrow Castro’s yoke at the first sign of an opportunity. This vision, however, was a mirage, a gross oversimplification of the Cuban reality.

When the boots hit the ground at the Bay of Pigs, the fantasy quickly crumbled under the weight of its own naivety. The expected popular uprising never materialized. Instead, the invaders found themselves trapped on a hostile beach, outgunned and outmaneuvered by Castro’s forces. The Cuban leader, far from being the fragile dictator the CIA had presumed, mobilized his military with a swift and decisive force, quashing the invasion in its tracks.

The aftermath was a humiliating retreat for the United States, a blunder that left an indelible scar on its foreign policy and intelligence reputation. It was a stark reminder of the perils of overconfidence and the dangers of crafting policy based on flawed assumptions and wishful thinking.

The Bay of Pigs invasion became a textbook case of how not to conduct foreign policy and covert operations. It underscored the importance of accurate, ground-level intelligence and the folly of underestimating an adversary. The echoes of this failure resonate in the intelligence missteps that followed, each a reminder that the greatest blunders often stem from a failure to grasp the realities of the world and the complexities of human societies.

Missing Iran’s Revolution

The Iranian Revolution of 1979 stands as a pivotal moment in the annals of intelligence oversights, a seismic event that reshaped the Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape. Here, the CIA, long the shadowy puppeteer in Iran, found itself blindsided by a tide of revolutionary fervor it had failed to anticipate.

For years, the CIA had placed its bets on the Shah of Iran, a monarch seen as a bulwark against the spread of Soviet influence. This alliance, however, blinded American intelligence to the undercurrents of dissatisfaction brewing beneath the surface of Iranian society. While the Shah’s regime glittered with the trappings of modernity and Westernization, deep rifts were tearing at the fabric of Iranian society.

The rise of Ayatollah Khomeini, a figure once considered a fringe element, was a glaring blind spot for the CIA. They underestimated the cleric’s influence and the depth of the religious and cultural currents driving the Iranian people. Khomeini’s narrative, one of nationalistic and religious fervor, resonated with the masses, striking a chord with those disillusioned by the Shah’s autocratic rule and Western orientation.

This intelligence gap was not merely a lapse in surveillance or data collection; it was a fundamental misreading of the social and political dynamics at play. The CIA, ensconced in its own echo chamber, clung to a narrative of stability and continuity, failing to see the writing on the walls of Tehran.

When the revolution erupted, it did so with a force that shocked both the Shah’s regime and its American backers. The streets of Iran became a battleground for change, a sweeping repudiation of the Shah’s rule, and by extension, the U.S. influence in the region. The fall of the Shah and the rise of the Islamic Republic represented not just a political shift, but a profound ideological realignment.

The Iranian Revolution laid bare the consequences of misreading the socio-political landscape and the perils of over-reliance on autocratic allies. It was a stark reminder of the limits of intelligence in understanding the complex tapestry of human societies. For the CIA and the broader U.S. foreign policy apparatus, it was a humbling lesson in the unpredictability of history and the often unseen forces that shape it.

The reverberations of this intelligence failure are still felt today, as the Iranian Revolution fundamentally altered the balance of power in the Middle East and set the stage for decades of tension and conflict. It stands as a cautionary tale of the dangers of ignoring the grassroots sentiments and the shifting sands of political power.

As the world reels from the aftermath of October 7, when the streets of Israel became a battleground with a death toll reaching into the thousands, a haunting question lingers in the air: How did we get here? The answer, buried in pages of intelligence ignored and warnings unheeded, is as complex as it is troubling. This isn’t just the story of Israel’s failure to anticipate Hamas’s audacity; it’s a narrative that finds eerie parallels in other intelligence failures that have shaped our world.

Thank you for reading, and remember.

Trust No Single Source

Trust Your Gut

and Stay Curious

For media inquiries, please contact:

UK - 020 3404 2295

USA - 0650 278 4440

AUS - 02 9072 9499

All of our writers risk it all by telling their stories and any support you can provide will make a big difference. Firstly by showing them that there words matter, but also by helping them keep the lights on and food in their bellies. Donate if you can and know every dollar goes to supporting our writers and authors.


bottom of page